HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon Pro 555
In this comparison between HD Graphics 630 and Radeon Pro 555 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 630 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 555 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics 630
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics 630 | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 555 has 400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- HD Graphics 630 has 62 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555.
- HD Graphics 630 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
- HD Graphics 630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 555 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 and Radeon Pro 555 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Battlefield 5 is 230% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
HD Graphics 630 and Radeon Pro 555 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Far Cry 5 is 316% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Fortnite is 136% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Minecraft is 32% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 237% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than HD Graphics 630. |
Full Specs
HD Graphics 630 | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Polaris |
Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 January 2017 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 24 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 855 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 1,306 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | - |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |