HD Graphics P530 vs Quadro FX 4800
In this comparison between HD Graphics P530 and Quadro FX 4800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics P530 will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 4800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 4800
HD Graphics P530 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics P530 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics P530 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics P530 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 900% more power consumption, than HD Graphics P530.
- HD Graphics P530 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics P530 has 204 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 4800.
- HD Graphics P530 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics P530 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 252 MHz higher, than HD Graphics P530.
- HD Graphics P530 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| HD Graphics P530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than HD Graphics P530. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than HD Graphics P530. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| HD Graphics P530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| HD Graphics P530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Minecraft is 3% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| HD Graphics P530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| HD Graphics P530 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics P530 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |