GeForce GTS 360M vs HD Graphics P630
When comparing GeForce GTS 360M and HD Graphics P630, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTS 360M and HD Graphics P630 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
HD Graphics P630
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 360M | HD Graphics P630 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1740 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 360M has 153% more power consumption, than HD Graphics P630.
- GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and HD Graphics P630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- HD Graphics P630 has 1739 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and HD Graphics P630 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and HD Graphics P630 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and HD Graphics P630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Minecraft is 45% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 360M | HD Graphics P630 | |
Architecture | GT2xx | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | N11E-GS1 | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 7 January 2010 | 5 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 96 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 1436 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 727 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 26.40 |
Floating-point performance | 275.71 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | + |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Gigaflops | 413 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |