GRID K240Q vs HD Graphics P630
When choosing between GRID K240Q and HD Graphics P630, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K240Q and HD Graphics P630.
GRID K240Q
HD Graphics P630
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | HD Graphics P630 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1740 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K240Q has 1400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics P630.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics P630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- HD Graphics P630 has 1739 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and HD Graphics P630 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics P630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K240Q and HD Graphics P630 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 37% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 60% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 41% more, than HD Graphics P630. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | HD Graphics P630 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GK104 | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 26.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |