GRID M10 8Q vs HD Graphics P630

In this comparison between GRID M10 8Q and HD Graphics P630 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M10 8Q will be the best choice, for others HD Graphics P630 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID M10 8Q

HD Graphics P630

Main Specs

	GRID M10 8Q	HD Graphics P630
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1740 MB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID M10 8Q has 1400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics P630.
GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics P630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
HD Graphics P630 has 1732 GB more memory, than GRID M10 8Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and HD Graphics P630 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics P630 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	3−4
ultra / 1080p	8−9	1−2
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	14−16
medium / 1080p	16−18	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than HD Graphics P630.
high / 1080p	21−24	7−8
ultra / 1080p	18−20	5−6
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	45−50	18−20
medium / 1080p	21−24	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than HD Graphics P630.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID M10 8Q and HD Graphics P630 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	190−200	120−130
medium / 768p	160−170	95−100
ultra / 1080p	85−90	45−50
QHD / 1440p	50−55	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	120−130	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than HD Graphics P630.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	35−40	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than HD Graphics P630.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	85−90	55−60
ultra / 1080p	55−60	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 53% more, than HD Graphics P630.
high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	14−16	3−4
4K / 2160p	5−6	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	16−18	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than HD Graphics P630.
high / 1080p	21−24	12−14
ultra / 1080p	16−18	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	90−95	55−60
medium / 1080p	45−50	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 105% more, than HD Graphics P630.
high / 1080p	21−24	6−7
ultra / 1080p	18−20	6−7
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
low / 720p	45−50	20−22
medium / 1080p	24−27	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 180% more, than HD Graphics P630.
low / 768p	75−80	45−50
medium / 768p	70−75	−
high / 1080p	24−27	8−9
ultra / 1080p	10−12	3−4
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than HD Graphics P630.
high / 1080p	8−9	2−3
ultra / 1080p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	7−8
medium / 1080p	10−12	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than HD Graphics P630.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	65−70
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than HD Graphics P630.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	50−55	27−30
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than HD Graphics P630.
high / 1080p	12−14	6−7
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	7−8
medium / 1080p	14−16	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than HD Graphics P630.
low / 768p	45−50	16−18
medium / 768p	30−33	12−14
high / 1080p	16−18	6−7
ultra / 1080p	10−11	4−5
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than HD Graphics P630.
low / 768p	95−100	70−75
medium / 768p	55−60	35−40
ultra / 1080p	30−35	16−18
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 53% more, than HD Graphics P630.

Full Specs

	GRID M10 8Q	HD Graphics P630
Architecture	Maxwell	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name	GM107	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	18 May 2016	5 August 2016
Pipelines	640	24
Core clock speed	1033 MHz
Boost Clock	1306 MHz	1100 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	52.24	26.40
Floating-point performance	1,672 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	83.2 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.103
CUDA	5.0
Quick Sync		+

GRID M10 8Q vs HD Graphics P630

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares