HD Graphics P630 vs Quadro K3100M
When comparing HD Graphics P630 and Quadro K3100M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between HD Graphics P630 and Quadro K3100M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
HD Graphics P630
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics P630 | Quadro K3100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K3100M has 400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics P630.
- HD Graphics P630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K3100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- HD Graphics P630 has 1736 GB more memory, than Quadro K3100M.
- HD Graphics P630 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3100M - in Mobile workstations.
- HD Graphics P630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K3100M - with Kepler.
- HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K3100M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 140% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| HD Graphics P630 and Quadro K3100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 60% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| HD Graphics P630 and Quadro K3100M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 46% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 73% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 225% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics P630 | Quadro K3100M | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Kepler |
| Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | N15E-Q1-A2 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 August 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 45.18 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |