HD Graphics P630 vs Quadro K4000M
In this comparison between HD Graphics P630 and Quadro K4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics P630 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics P630
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics P630 | Quadro K4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K4000M has 566% more power consumption, than HD Graphics P630.
- HD Graphics P630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- HD Graphics P630 has 1736 GB more memory, than Quadro K4000M.
- HD Graphics P630 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- HD Graphics P630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
- HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
HD Graphics P630 and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 37% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 60% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 20% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than HD Graphics P630. |
Full Specs
HD Graphics P630 | Quadro K4000M | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Kepler |
Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | N14E-Q3 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 5 August 2016 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 24 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 48.08 |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | - |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- HD Graphics P630 vs GeForce GTX 460M
- HD Graphics P630 vs HD Graphics 630
- Quadro K4000M vs GeForce GTX 460M
- Quadro K4000M vs HD Graphics 630
- HD Graphics P630 vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- HD Graphics P630 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000