HD Graphics P630 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
In this comparison between HD Graphics P630 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics P630 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics P630
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics P630 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 333% more power consumption, than HD Graphics P630.
- HD Graphics P630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- HD Graphics P630 has 1736 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- HD Graphics P630 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- HD Graphics P630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- HD Graphics P630 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
HD Graphics P630 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 105% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 180% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 20% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than HD Graphics P630. |
Full Specs
HD Graphics P630 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Polaris |
Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 5 August 2016 | 26 September 2019 |
Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 41.44 |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | - |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |