HD Graphics P630 vs Radeon R8 M365DX
In this comparison between HD Graphics P630 and Radeon R8 M365DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics P630 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R8 M365DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics P630
Radeon R8 M365DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R8 M365DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R8 M365DX here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics P630 | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- HD Graphics P630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R8 M365DX uses IGP interface.
- HD Graphics P630 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R8 M365DX - in Laptops.
- HD Graphics P630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R8 M365DX - with GCN.
- HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R8 M365DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Minecraft is 45% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics P630 | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN |
| Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | Meso |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 August 2016 | 3 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 720 / 1125 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 27.00 |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 / 1000 MHz | |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |