FirePro M4150 vs Iris Graphics 5100
When comparing FirePro M4150 and Iris Graphics 5100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and Iris Graphics 5100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 515 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Fortnite is 12% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| FirePro M4150 and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | Opal | Haswell GT3 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 48.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |