FirePro W5100 vs Iris Graphics 5100
When comparing FirePro W5100 and Iris Graphics 5100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W5100 and Iris Graphics 5100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W5100
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W5100 has 66% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 730 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 220% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 86% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 82% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 150% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 190% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 70% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 271% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | Bonaire | Haswell GT3 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 768 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 48.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R7 260X
- FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon R7 260X
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- FirePro W5100 vs Quadro 3000M
- FirePro W5100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro 3000M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850