FirePro W8100 vs Iris Graphics 5100
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and Iris Graphics 5100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 5100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 633% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 624 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 590% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W8100 and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 383% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 544% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 46% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 785% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | Hawaii | Haswell GT3 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 48.00 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro P2000
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro 3000M
- FirePro W8100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro 3000M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850