GeForce 8800 GTX vs Iris Graphics 5100
When choosing between GeForce 8800 GTX and Iris Graphics 5100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 8800 GTX and Iris Graphics 5100.
GeForce 8800 GTX
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 8800 GTX has 416% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 1.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 8800 GTX is 376 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by 90 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 210% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Architecture | Tesla | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | G80 | Haswell GT3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 November 2006 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 128 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 681 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | 48.00 |
Floating-point performance | 345.6 gflops | |
Length | 270 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 575 | |
SLI options | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon HD 8730M
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs GeForce GT 640M LE
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon HD 8730M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs GeForce GT 640M LE
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs Quadro 3000M
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro 3000M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850