GeForce GT 740A vs Iris Graphics 5100
When comparing GeForce GT 740A and Iris Graphics 5100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 740A and Iris Graphics 5100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GT 740A
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 740A | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 740A has 10% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GeForce GT 740A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 740A is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GT 740A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 740A is 780 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GeForce GT 740A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 740A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 210% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 740A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce GT 740A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 740A | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GK208 | Haswell GT3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 August 2013 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 48.00 |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 3.5 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 740A vs Radeon HD 6550A
- GeForce GT 740A vs Radeon HD 7730M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon HD 6550A
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon HD 7730M
- GeForce GT 740A vs Quadro 3000M
- GeForce GT 740A vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro 3000M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850