GeForce GTX 465 vs Iris Graphics 5100
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 465 and Iris Graphics 5100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 465 will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 5100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Iris Graphics 5100
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 1015 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
3−4
ultra / 1080p
8−9
1−2
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
14−16
medium / 1080p
18−20
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
21−24
7−8
ultra / 1080p
20−22
6−7
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
18−20
medium / 1080p
24−27
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
200−210
120−130
medium / 768p
170−180
100−110
ultra / 1080p
95−100
45−50
QHD / 1440p
50−55
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
18−20
high / 768p
130−140
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 78% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
medium / 768p
90−95
50−55
ultra / 1080p
60−65
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 68% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
14−16
3−4
4K / 2160p
6−7
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
18−20
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 280% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−12
ultra / 1080p
18−20
6−7
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
95−100
55−60
medium / 1080p
50−55
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 133% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
24−27
7−8
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
8−9
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
50−55
20−22
medium / 1080p
27−30
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 180% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
27−30
6−7
ultra / 1080p
12−14
3−4
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 115% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
9−10
2−3
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
6−7
medium / 1080p
12−14
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
8−9
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
50−55
12−14
medium / 768p
30−35
10−11
high / 1080p
18−20
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 242% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
40−45
ultra / 1080p
30−35
16−18
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Iris Graphics 5100
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
GF100
Haswell GT3
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
31 May 2010
5 June 2013
Pipelines
352
40
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
1,300 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
48.00
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.3
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price