GRID K280Q vs Iris Graphics 5100

When comparing GRID K280Q and Iris Graphics 5100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K280Q and Iris Graphics 5100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K280Q

Iris Graphics 5100 Check Price

Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:

Iris Graphics 5100 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K280Q	Iris Graphics 5100
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K280Q has 650% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 545 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	3−4
ultra / 1080p	7−8	1−2
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	14−16
medium / 1080p	14−16	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p	18−20	7−8
ultra / 1080p	16−18	6−7
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	18−20
medium / 1080p	21−24	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	180−190	120−130
medium / 768p	150−160	100−110
ultra / 1080p	80−85	45−50
QHD / 1440p	45−50	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	18−20
high / 768p	120−130	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 60% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	30−35	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
GRID K280Q and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	80−85	50−55
ultra / 1080p	50−55	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p	14−16	4−5
ultra / 1080p	12−14	3−4
4K / 2160p	5−6	2−3
low / 720p	30−35	12−14
medium / 1080p	14−16	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 220% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p	21−24	10−12
ultra / 1080p	14−16	6−7
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
low / 720p	85−90	55−60
medium / 1080p	40−45	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 86% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p	20−22	7−8
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
QHD / 1440p	6−7	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	40−45	20−22
medium / 1080p	21−24	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p	70−75	45−50
medium / 768p	65−70	−
high / 1080p	21−24	6−7
ultra / 1080p	10−11	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 84% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p	7−8	2−3
ultra / 1080p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	6−7
medium / 1080p	10−11	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 225% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
4K / 2160p	−	75−80
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	45−50	30−35
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	21−24	8−9
medium / 1080p	14−16	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p	40−45	12−14
medium / 768p	27−30	10−11
high / 1080p	14−16	5−6
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p	95−100	75−80
medium / 768p	55−60	40−45
ultra / 1080p	27−30	16−18
high / 768p	45−50	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.

Full Specs

	GRID K280Q	Iris Graphics 5100
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name	GK104	Haswell GT3
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	5 June 2013
Pipelines	1536	40
Core clock speed	745 MHz	200 MHz
Boost Clock		1200 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	48.00
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.80
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K280Q vs Iris Graphics 5100

Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares