GRID M60 2Q vs Iris Graphics 5100
In this comparison between GRID M60 2Q and Iris Graphics 5100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 2Q will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 5100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 2Q
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 650% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 357 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 2Q and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 383% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 544% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 46% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 785% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GM204 | Haswell GT3 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 48.00 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |