Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro CX
When comparing Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro CX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro CX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro CX
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 5100 | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 402 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Fortnite is 33% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 19% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 5100 | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3 | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 40 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro 3000M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Quadro CX vs Quadro 3000M
- Quadro CX vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs GeForce GT 645M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics