Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro FX 4800
When comparing Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro FX 4800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro FX 4800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 4800
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 402 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Haswell GT3 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |