Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro K620M
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro K620M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 5100 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro K620M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro K620M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 or Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 5100
Quadro K620M
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
System Shared
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 30 Watt.
Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 829 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro K620M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
3−4
ultra / 1080p
1−2
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
5−6
5−6
Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
7−8
7−8
ultra / 1080p
6−7
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
18−20
medium / 1080p
8−9
8−9
Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
95−100
ultra / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
high / 768p
70−75
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
65−70
70−75
ultra / 1080p
21−24
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
75−80
75−80
medium / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
4−5
4−5
ultra / 1080p
3−4
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
5−6
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
10−12
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
55−60
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Fortnite is 5% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
7−8
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
20−22
21−24
medium / 1080p
9−10
9−10
Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
6−7
8−9
ultra / 1080p
3−4
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
40−45
Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
7−8
medium / 1080p
4−5
3−4
Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
high / 1080p
80−85
65−70
4K / 2160p
75−80
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Quadro K620M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
12−14
16−18
medium / 768p
10−11
12−14
high / 1080p
5−6
6−7
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
75−80
70−75
medium / 768p
40−45
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
16−18
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Quadro K620M.
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 5100
Quadro K620M
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Maxwell
Code name
Haswell GT3
GM108
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 June 2013
1 March 2015
Pipelines
40
384
Core clock speed
200 MHz
1029 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1124 MHz
Transistor count
1,300 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
48.00
17.98
Floating-point performance
863.2 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
92 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
