Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon HD 4810
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Graphics 5100 and Radeon HD 4810, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Graphics 5100 stacks up against Radeon HD 4810, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 4810
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4810 has 216% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4810 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4810 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 210% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | − |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | TeraScale |
| Code name | Haswell GT3 | RV770 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 28 May 2009 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |