Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 5100 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 5100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 3100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Graphics 5100 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 or Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 5100
Radeon PRO WX 3100
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 116% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
14−16
ultra / 1080p
1−2
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
27−30
medium / 1080p
5−6
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 180% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
low / 768p
120−130
200−210
medium / 768p
100−110
170−180
ultra / 1080p
45−50
90−95
QHD / 1440p
24−27
50−55
4K / 2160p
18−20
30−33
high / 768p
70−75
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 76% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
medium / 768p
50−55
90−95
ultra / 1080p
24−27
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 68% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
4K / 2160p
2−3
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 260% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
90−95
medium / 1080p
14−16
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 116% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
9−10
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 160% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
45−50
80−85
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
6−7
27−30
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
2−3
9−10
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
6−7
27−30
medium / 1080p
4−5
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
4K / 2160p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
30−35
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 112% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
12−14
50−55
medium / 768p
10−11
30−35
high / 1080p
5−6
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 242% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
75−80
100−105
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 5100
Radeon PRO WX 3100
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Polaris
Code name
Haswell GT3
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 June 2013
21 March 2017
Pipelines
40
512
Core clock speed
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1219 MHz
Transistor count
1,300 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
48.00
39.01
Floating-point performance
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.2.131
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
