Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
When comparing Iris Graphics 5100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Graphics 5100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 5100 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 66% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 530 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
Iris Graphics 5100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 5100 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3 | Oland |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 40 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 780 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro 3000M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro K2000M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs UHD Graphics 620