Iris Graphics 5100 vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 5100 and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 5100 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 650% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 833 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 90% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 380% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 166% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 240% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 328% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Maxwell |
| Code name | Haswell GT3 | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |