Iris Graphics 5100 vs Tesla M60
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Graphics 5100 and Tesla M60, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Graphics 5100 stacks up against Tesla M60, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M60
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M60 is 357 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 616% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 630% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Graphics 5100 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 405% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 577% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 347% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 1025% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 46% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 450% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 814% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Haswell GT3 | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |