FirePro M4150 vs Iris Graphics 540
When comparing FirePro M4150 and Iris Graphics 540, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and Iris Graphics 540 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Graphics 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 63 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 540 - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 540 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 415 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and Iris Graphics 540 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Fortnite is 73% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Forza Horizon 4 is 88% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Minecraft is 14% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | Opal | Skylake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.97 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |