FireStream 9370 vs Iris Graphics 540
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and Iris Graphics 540, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against Iris Graphics 540, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 60 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 540 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Graphics 540 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 525 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Graphics 540 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 30% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than Iris Graphics 540. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | Cypress | Skylake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Iris Graphics 540 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Iris Graphics 540 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce MX150
- Iris Graphics 540 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI
- Iris Graphics 540 vs GeForce MX150