GeForce GT 745A vs Iris Graphics 540
In this comparison between GeForce GT 745A and Iris Graphics 540 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 745A will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 540 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 745A
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 745A has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GeForce GT 745A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 62 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 540 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GT 745A is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Graphics 540 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 745A is 537 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GeForce GT 745A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 745A and Iris Graphics 540 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 745A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Fortnite is 57% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GT 745A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GK107 | Skylake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 August 2013 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.28 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 26 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |