GeForce GTX 760A vs Iris Graphics 540
When comparing GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Graphics 540, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Graphics 540 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 760A
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 62 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 540 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Graphics 540 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 328 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Fortnite is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Minecraft is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GK106 | Skylake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |