GRID K240Q vs Iris Graphics 540

When comparing GRID K240Q and Iris Graphics 540, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and Iris Graphics 540 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K240Q

Iris Graphics 540 Check Price

Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:

Iris Graphics 540 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K240Q	Iris Graphics 540
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type	GDDR5	eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	64 MB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K240Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Graphics 540 has 63 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 540 - in Laptops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Graphics 540 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 540 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	8−9
ultra / 1080p	6−7	5−6
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	20−22
medium / 1080p	12−14	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Iris Graphics 540.
high / 1080p	16−18	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 540.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K240Q and Iris Graphics 540 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	170−180	150−160
medium / 768p	140−150	130−140
ultra / 1080p	75−80	65−70
QHD / 1440p	40−45	35−40
4K / 2160p	30−33	27−30
high / 768p	110−120	95−100
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Iris Graphics 540.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	27−30	24−27
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Graphics 540.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
medium / 768p	75−80	65−70
ultra / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 13% more, than Iris Graphics 540.
high / 1080p	12−14	10−11
ultra / 1080p	10−12	9−10
4K / 2160p	4−5	4−5
low / 720p	27−30	24−27
medium / 1080p	12−14	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Iris Graphics 540.
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	75−80	70−75
medium / 1080p	35−40	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 12% more, than Iris Graphics 540.
high / 1080p	18−20	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
QHD / 1440p	4−5	3−4
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	21−24	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Iris Graphics 540.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
medium / 768p	60−65	50−55
high / 1080p	20−22	16−18
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than Iris Graphics 540.
high / 1080p	7−8	6−7
ultra / 1080p	5−6	4−5
4K / 2160p	1−2	1−2
low / 720p	20−22	16−18
medium / 1080p	9−10	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Iris Graphics 540.
low / 768p	100−110	95−100
high / 1080p	−	95−100
ultra / 1080p	90−95	85−90
medium / 1080p	100−105	95−100
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 540.
high / 1080p	18−20	18−20
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	35−40
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Iris Graphics 540.
high / 1080p	12−14	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	16−18
medium / 1080p	12−14	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Iris Graphics 540.
low / 768p	35−40	30−35
medium / 768p	24−27	21−24
high / 1080p	12−14	10−12
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than Iris Graphics 540.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	50−55	50−55
ultra / 1080p	27−30	24−27
high / 768p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Iris Graphics 540.

Full Specs

	GRID K240Q	Iris Graphics 540
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 9 Skylake
Code name	GK104	Skylake GT3e
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	1 September 2015
Pipelines	1536	48
Core clock speed	745 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1050 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	50.40
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.97
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K240Q vs Iris Graphics 540

Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares