GRID M6 8Q vs Iris Graphics 540
When comparing GRID M6 8Q and Iris Graphics 540, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Iris Graphics 540 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M6 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 64 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 56 GB more memory, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 540 - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 540 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 422 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 52% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 75% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 114% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Graphics 540. |
Full Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GM204 | Skylake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |