Iris Graphics 540 vs P106 100
When choosing between Iris Graphics 540 and P106 100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Graphics 540 and P106 100.
P106 100
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 540 | P106 100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 100 has 700% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- Iris Graphics 540 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and P106 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 58 GB more memory, than P106 100.
- Iris Graphics 540 is used in Laptops, and P106 100 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 540 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and P106 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 1206 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and P106 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 272% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 209% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 165% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 342% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Iris Graphics 540. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 540 | P106 100 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Pascal |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | GP106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 19 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 48 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 4,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 136.7 |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |