Iris Graphics 540 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
When choosing between Iris Graphics 540 and Radeon HD 4850 X2, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Graphics 540 and Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 540 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 1566% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- Iris Graphics 540 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 448 GB more memory, than Iris Graphics 540.
- Iris Graphics 540 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 540 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4850 X2 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Fortnite is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 540 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | TeraScale |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | R700 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 48 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.68 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |