Iris Graphics 540 vs Tesla C2050
When comparing Iris Graphics 540 and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Graphics 540 and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 540 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1486% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- Iris Graphics 540 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 61 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Iris Graphics 540 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 540 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 49% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 72% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 114% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Graphics 540. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 540 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Fermi |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |