Iris Graphics 540 vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between Iris Graphics 540 and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Graphics 540 and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 540 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 1486% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- Iris Graphics 540 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 58 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- Iris Graphics 540 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 540 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 81% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 84% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 49% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 63% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 85% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Graphics 540. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 540 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Fermi |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |