Iris Graphics 550 vs P106 090
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 550 and P106 090 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 550 will be the best choice, for others P106 090 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 090
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 550 | P106 090 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 090 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and P106 090 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 550 has 61 GB more memory, than P106 090.
- Iris Graphics 550 is used in Laptops, and P106 090 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 550 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and P106 090 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 1054 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and P106 090 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 58% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Graphics 550 and P106 090 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 41% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 41% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Iris Graphics 550. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 550 | P106 090 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Pascal |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | GP106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 31 July 2017 |
Pipelines | 48 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 4,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 73.49 |
Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |