Iris Graphics 550 vs Radeon HD 4810
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Graphics 550 and Radeon HD 4810, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Graphics 550 stacks up against Radeon HD 4810, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 4810
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 550 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4810 has 533% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4810 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4810 has 448 GB more memory, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4810 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 550 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 321% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Dota 2 is 182% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Fortnite is 227% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Minecraft is 90% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Radeon HD 4810. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 550 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | TeraScale |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | RV770 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 28 May 2009 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 20.00 |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Length | 246 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |