Iris Graphics 550 vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Iris Graphics 550 and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Graphics 550 and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 550 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 1486% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 550 has 58 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- Iris Graphics 550 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 550 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 84% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 58% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 76% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 28% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Graphics 550. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 550 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Fermi |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost