Iris Graphics 550 vs Tesla M2070 Q
When choosing between Iris Graphics 550 and Tesla M2070 Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Graphics 550 and Tesla M2070 Q.
Tesla M2070 Q
Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 550 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 550 has 58 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Iris Graphics 550 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 550 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
- Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Graphics 550 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Fortnite is 36% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 550 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Fermi |
| Code name | Skylake GT3e | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |