FirePro S7150 vs Iris Graphics 6100
When comparing FirePro S7150 and Iris Graphics 6100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7150 and Iris Graphics 6100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7150
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 6100 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 6100 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 6100 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 620 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 6100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 201% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 571% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 363% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 46% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 563% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | Tonga | Broadwell GT3 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 5 January 2015 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |