FirePro V4900 vs Iris Graphics 6100
In this comparison between FirePro V4900 and Iris Graphics 6100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V4900 will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 6100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
Iris Graphics 6100
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V4900 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 6100 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 6100 - in Laptops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Graphics 6100 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 6100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
4−5
ultra / 1080p
1−2
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
4−5
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
85−90
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
high / 768p
65−70
60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
low / 768p
75−80
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
high / 1080p
3−4
6−7
ultra / 1080p
2−3
5−6
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
4−5
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
50−55
50−55
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Fortnite is 10% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
7−8
9−10
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
40−45
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
8−9
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V4900 and Iris Graphics 6100 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p
2−3
3−4
ultra / 1080p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
5−6
8−9
medium / 1080p
3−4
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
high / 1080p
60−65
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
12−14
18−20
medium / 768p
10−11
12−14
high / 1080p
5−6
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
80−85
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
high / 768p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
Iris Graphics 6100
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
Turks
Broadwell GT3
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 November 2011
5 January 2015
Pipelines
480
48
Core clock speed
800 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
52.80
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
