GeForce 820A vs Iris Graphics 6100
When choosing between GeForce 820A and Iris Graphics 6100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 820A and Iris Graphics 6100.
GeForce 820A
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 820A | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 15 Watt.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 6100 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 6100 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 6100 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 475 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 6100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 820A | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | GF117 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 5 January 2015 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 52.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |