GeForce 8800 GTX vs Iris Graphics 6100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 8800 GTX and Iris Graphics 6100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 8800 GTX and Iris Graphics 6100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 8800 GTX
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 8800 GTX has 933% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 6100 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 6100 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Iris Graphics 6100 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 8800 GTX is 276 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by 90 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 6100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
Architecture | Tesla | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | G80 | Broadwell GT3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 November 2006 | 5 January 2015 |
Pipelines | 128 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 681 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 345.6 gflops | |
Length | 270 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 575 | |
SLI options | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon HD 8730M
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs GeForce GT 640M LE
- Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon HD 8730M
- Iris Graphics 6100 vs GeForce GT 640M LE
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon R6 M340DX
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon R9 M365X
- Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon R6 M340DX
- Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon R9 M365X