GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Graphics 6100
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Graphics 6100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Graphics 6100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 966% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 6100 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 6100 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 6100 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 479 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 6100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Graphics 6100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 59% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 19% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 81% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | GF114 | Broadwell GT3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 5 January 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Iris Graphics 6100 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Iris Graphics 6100 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R6 M340DX
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 M365X
- Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon R6 M340DX
- Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon R9 M365X