GeForce GTX 760A vs Iris Graphics 6100
When comparing GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Graphics 6100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Graphics 6100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 760A
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 6100 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 6100 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Graphics 6100 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 328 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 6100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Graphics 6100 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Fortnite is 13% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Graphics 6100 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Graphics 6100 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Graphics 6100 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Graphics 6100 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | GK106 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 5 January 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 52.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |