GeForce GTX 880M vs Iris Graphics 6100
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 880M and Iris Graphics 6100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 880M will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 6100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 880M and Iris Graphics 6100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 880M and Iris Graphics 6100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M or Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 880M
Iris Graphics 6100
Power consumption (TDP)
122 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 880M has 713% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
GeForce GTX 880M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Graphics 6100 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 880M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Graphics 6100 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 880M is 654 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 6100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
4−5
ultra / 1080p
12−14
3−4
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
12−14
medium / 1080p
24−27
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
high / 1080p
30−35
−
ultra / 1080p
27−30
7−8
QHD / 1440p
12−14
0−1
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
65−70
18−20
medium / 1080p
35−40
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
low / 768p
230−240
110−120
medium / 768p
200−210
85−90
ultra / 1080p
120−130
40−45
QHD / 1440p
90−95
24−27
4K / 2160p
50−55
−
high / 768p
160−170
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 148% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
14−16
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 42% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
low / 768p
120−130
70−75
medium / 768p
100−110
45−50
ultra / 1080p
80−85
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Dota 2 is 116% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
high / 1080p
24−27
6−7
ultra / 1080p
21−24
5−6
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
3−4
low / 720p
50−55
12−14
medium / 1080p
27−30
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Far Cry 5 is 285% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
high / 1080p
30−35
12−14
ultra / 1080p
24−27
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
120−130
50−55
medium / 1080p
70−75
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Fortnite is 186% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
high / 1080p
35−40
9−10
ultra / 1080p
24−27
9−10
QHD / 1440p
14−16
0−1
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
18−20
medium / 1080p
35−40
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
low / 768p
100−110
40−45
medium / 768p
90−95
35−40
high / 1080p
40−45
8−9
ultra / 1080p
16−18
5−6
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Grand Theft Auto V is 178% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
high / 1080p
12−14
3−4
ultra / 1080p
10−11
2−3
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
low / 768p
120−130
90−95
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Minecraft is 35% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
8−9
medium / 1080p
21−24
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
low / 768p
75−80
18−20
medium / 768p
45−50
12−14
high / 1080p
24−27
7−8
ultra / 1080p
14−16
5−6
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 272% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
low / 768p
90−95
80−85
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
40−45
14−16
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Graphics 6100.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 880M
Iris Graphics 6100
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
N15E-GX-A2
Broadwell GT3
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
12 March 2014
5 January 2015
Pipelines
1536
48
Core clock speed
954 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
993 MHz
1100 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
127.1
52.80
Floating-point performance
3,050 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
1536
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
96 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price