Iris Graphics 6100 vs P106 100
When comparing Iris Graphics 6100 and P106 100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Graphics 6100 and P106 100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
P106 100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 6100 | P106 100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 100 has 700% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and P106 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and P106 100 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and P106 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 1206 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and P106 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 201% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 571% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 363% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 46% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 563% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 6100 | P106 100 | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Pascal |
Code name | Broadwell GT3 | GP106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 January 2015 | 19 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 48 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 4,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 136.7 |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |