Iris Graphics 6100 vs Quadro 2000D
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Graphics 6100 and Quadro 2000D, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Graphics 6100 stacks up against Quadro 2000D, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 2000D
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 313% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Graphics 6100 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| Iris Graphics 6100 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Fortnite is 15% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| Iris Graphics 6100 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| Iris Graphics 6100 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 83% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Fermi |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | GF106 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |