Iris Graphics 6100 vs Quadro 500M
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 6100 and Quadro 500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 6100 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 500M
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Quadro 500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 500M has 133% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro 500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 500M - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro 500M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 500M is 400 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 500M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Quadro 500M | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Fermi |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | GF108 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 585 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 11.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |