Iris Graphics 6100 vs Quadro FX 4800
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Graphics 6100 and Quadro FX 4800, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Graphics 6100 stacks up against Quadro FX 4800, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 4800
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 302 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Graphics 6100 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| Iris Graphics 6100 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Fortnite is 15% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| Iris Graphics 6100 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| Iris Graphics 6100 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 83% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |